As Road Toll returns, there is a growing debate on whether the E-Levy should stay or go.
On the one hand, proponents argue that the E-Levy is necessary to fund infrastructure development and maintenance.
They argue that without the E-Levy, there would be insufficient funds to build and maintain roads, bridges, and other transportation infrastructure.
On the other hand, opponents argue that the E-Levy is a burden on motorists, who already pay a significant amount in fuel taxes and other fees.
They argue that the E-Levy is regressive and disproportionately affects low-income drivers.
In light of these arguments, the question remains: Should the E-Levy stay or go?
What are the pros and cons of each option, and what would be the best way forward for policymakers and motorists alike?
These are complex questions that require careful consideration and analysis, and there is no easy answer.
Leave feedback about this